TED Fellows 2009 -
« Back to blog

In Social Enterprise force yourself to be an entrepreneur first

 

Entrepreneurs or Idiots?
Don't let the social overtake the enterprise.

 

As I sit at my desk in Guatemala reading the business plans of the finalists of our Guateverde competition (http://www.guateverde.com) I keep thinking about my start in social enterprise and all the mistakes I made in getting AIDG to the point where we will now invest a few million USD  in local enterprises over the next five years. I also think about all the other social enterprises I have seen over the years that have closed down.

I am routinely heartbroken by seeing good small international programs close down, putting kids back on the street, ending that production of biodiesel, stopping the youth empowerment program, because the social entrepreneurs that started them lost focus of some of the basic fundamentals of managing an enterprise. It is easy to get swept up in the mission but don’t be a “buro” and have to watch the doors on your program close.

Talking to major donor early in my program he did not seem impressed with my metrics or organizational strategy. My quick repartee? "But you have to take into account I only started with $800 and a bag of tools" His reply "I will take that into consideration". Translation: “Honestly you were a well paid programmer and you started with only $800? You aren’t an entrepreneur, you are an idiot.”

Fortunately if you are starting a new program abroad you don’t need to be an idiot like I was. Here are ten “rules” of starting an international service organization that would have helped me if I had known them a few years ago, and maybe can help you. To anybody running an organization they may seem obvious but it is amazing how many early stage entrepreneurs ignore them while focussed on the mission of trying to just get the school built, the pollution reduced, the farm running, etc.  With these rules maybe you can start an enterprise  that is as much enterprise as it is social.

Rule number 1: Don’t start a new organization

There are literally millions of established organizations globally that are in need of support. Before you start something new ask yourself: “What can I do to help something that is already here become more effective?” There are several programs I know of now that if I had learned about them earlier and applied to a management position it could have likely saved me a few years in getting my program running.

Rule number 2: Clearly define what you do and stick with it

So in the face of massive unmet need there is always the temptation to run the feeding-housing-water-sanitation-ecotourism-renewable energy-child education-dolphin saving program. But unless you are say putting up a millennium village presenting this type of program to funders can be a tough sell. To draw an example from my experience at AIDG donors may not see the clear link between a program in say ecotourism and a program in say light industrial fabrication. Don't be a swiss army knife. Do one or two things well and be selective about program expansion.

Rule number 3: Clearly define your budgets and cash flow, and track your variance

Put down your shovel, or wrench, or blackboard and pull out an excel sheet (A great template from the for profit world is available here: http://caribbean.smetoolkit.org/caribbean/en/file/195?1194044785 ). Figure out what your budget is month by month, your cash flow and income, set targets and track the variances. If you are living month to month do everything you can to cut your burn rate to the bare essentials, and then build your cash reserves. It does nobody any good if your program closes because that grant you were expecting in January doesn’t show up till March. And without getting it all down you will never see that dry spell coming.

Rule Number 4: It costs more than you expect, get more than you need

Honestly don’t be afraid to ask for enough money to really have impact. If you have a well communicated business plan, have made the right connections, have the right board and advisors you have a better chance of making your impact by starting with enough resources to actually enact your mission at some scale instead of constantly being stuck dealing in trials.

Rule number 5: Get legal, and stay legal.

In developing countries this can sometimes mean months and even years in bureaucratic limbo. But you want to be formal from day one. This also might mean paying yourself according to US labor laws if you are a US charity, getting insurance, getting title to that truck you picked up at the border. Get it all in writing, your contracts, your grants, your projects, your partnerships, and keep those records. The sooner you are clean cut and can show all the proper documents the sooner you will attract capital.

Rule number 6: Pay yourself and your staff from the beginning

Everybody wants to volunteer for a good cause but many early stage Social Entrepreneurs volunteer for months or years without compensation or on base living stipends. I've seen more than a few programs shut down or almost shut down because the social entrepreneurs were so flat broke/in credit card debt they had no choice but to go back to work again in the states. The worst service you can provide a community is to start a program that is good and then force it to close suddenly because you put yourself at financial risk.

Rule number 7: Communicate openly with your staff and board, and have clear roles and responsibilities

It is important from the point of hire to be clear with people what their roles and responsibilities are, who is accountable, and who has the final say in decisions. I have seen an organization lose a million dollar grant because of conflict between staff, board and management about goals with no clear deferment to one party.

Rule number 8: Treat both constituents and donors as customers

Most NGOs when they are small lose track of their donors while they are wrapped up in providing good services for their constituents. It is an unfortunate donor as ATM mentality. With some large NGOs this switches and the donors tend to take priority. To be successful treat both donors and constituents as customers you want to keep happy. If you talk to both donors and constituents on a regular basis you have a good shot of creating an effective organization.

Rule Number 9: Play nice with others

Partnership and collaboration in the Non-profit world is always better than competition. In fact if you ever want to work with multilaterals it may be your only way in the door (many multilaterals use partnerships as an introduction mechanism for funding). Start early and figure out how to leverage the strengths and experiences of other more established groups instead of doing everything yourself.

And the final Rule: Don't be a non-profit. 

Bogo light, Tom’s Shoes, SKS Microfinance, there are plenty of examples of organizations that can scale quickly in providing services to people because they are for profit entities. Investment can be easier to find than donation and making money with each client served is always more scalable than losing it. While sometimes, like the case with AIDG’s training services, there is a need that it would be difficult to establish a profit model around, there are plenty of social ills that can be met in a for profit model. See if your cause fits.

Posted by Peter Haas 

Comments (14)

Oct 22, 2009
pragzz said...
Well said Peter. I completely agree with these rules. I studied the best practices of BoP focused tech enterprises for my grad school thesis (something I would like to and have continued). You've outlined A LOT of them.

Aside from losing focus, the biggest mistakes I continually saw of the groups that were failing, related to finance...not balancing inflows/outflows, and not paying themselves/employees. Its very easy to get demoralized when you can't afford anything.

I also think that good social enterprises need to start setting realistic expectations with donors.  In an effort to get funds, even good organizations are shortselling themselves in their funding, and end up screwing up their projects. Donors have become so used to giving out miniscule sums of money for impossibly large projects, that they don't accept good, realistic proposals. I think if enough good social enterprises start setting the trend of realism, there will be more success on both sides.
Oct 22, 2009
Hi Peter!

I am a young Ophthalmologist, but this gives me such deep insight into starting organizations and initiatives with a mission of them being Self Sustaining in terms of Finance and Effect.

Thanks for posting these up. I have heard how people lose focus on the initial goals they set out in the beginning, and many donors lose interest in the cause. I guess proper planning and foresight goes a long way in enabling the vision to run to its full potential. Its all about saving for a rainy day!

I intend to spread REPOrT as an Idea that people and organizations would want to embrace as their own and sustain it forming their own small loops. Replicate the Idea in a smaller scale and ensure that it truly makes a difference in children's lives as it should. One Eye at a Time.. Change one Life at a time..

I think Rule 9 is Getafix's Magic potion of the Gauls! So vital to connect with people on the same frequency who believe in your idea and embrace it as their own and work for it passionately. I have had my share of struggle in the initial phases of REPOrT. I do NOT ask anyone for Financial funding. Only share it with them and encourage them to replicate the Idea and bear the minor costs involved. I usually conduct the editions personally. Currently working on a massive network of Eye Injury reporting and also involving the Urban Surgeons to do some Free surgery for Rural children who might not have access to it. Maybe this will involve a lot of planning financially.

T'was a good read. As a young rookie, I can use all the experience of you guys to mentor me!

Thanks!

Best,
Vipin
REPOrT

Oct 22, 2009
Eric Johnson said...
Such great advice, Peter! Wish you had beat me to to it - http://post.ly/704L
Oct 22, 2009
Fellow TED Fellows Rules :) Totally agree with the for profit choice. For me, the most dificult is to turn Ideas into Business model
Oct 23, 2009
Olivier said...
Great to finally highly enlighten words about real social concerns.
Oct 23, 2009
 said...
Pragzz, agreed on working towards realism in results and costs. I saw a big Macy's ad in NYC that was advertising feeding a family for a $1 donation. Unless you are a UN food program that could be unrealistic without other subsidies/restricted funding. I don't even think Akshaya Patra, one of the most efficient feeding programs in the world (awesome apro-tech there BTW), could get that low for a day. It is like a for profit selling something bellow cost as a loss leader.

In that vein I'd really like to see more donors take up the cause of giving restricted funding for early stage S.E. payroll and less than sexy operational costs, like insurance, and audits, and rent. Not as exciting as building that school but just as vital.

Oct 23, 2009
pragzz said...
Peter, I totally agree that the overhead funding issue is a MAJOR problem. A donor was recently complaining to me about how a mass of money that he donated to building school toilets went to cover staff salaries. He was livid, even though i explained to him that he had probably done more good by ensuring the payment of their hardworking staff. It continually surprises me that people who routinely run successful businesses do not understand the need to cover overhead expenses!! Further, I was shocked at his complete lack of diligence in checking out the organization before he gave them his money. He would definitely have been more careful if he had been investing in a business...why the lower standards??

I would be very curious to read your thoughts on "How to be an effective donor/investor" from your point-of-view. There are plenty of good donors out there, but they are clueless on how to be effective.

 
Oct 23, 2009
Logan Smalley said...
"The worst service you can provide a community is to start a program that is good and then force it to close suddenly because you put yourself at financial risk"---Thanks for making such an important point, Peter.

Pragzz, regarding your masters thesis....maybe Peter can help you write the book you should be writing!? :)

Oct 24, 2009
Esther Chae said...
Very insightful, thanks Phass.

TED LB Fellow


Oct 25, 2009
<tr><td>I sent this post to share with a few non-profits and cooperatives/collectives.  Just having your rules/a framework to reflect upon is so helpful to invite others to assess where their strengths and weaknesses in the ventures lie. 
Aren't you glad that you started your own non-profit in the end?  Even though you could have joined an existing one?  Seems like you learned so much and are now very successful from your growing experience.
thanks~ Colleen

---</td></tr>
Oct 25, 2009
gdaf said...
This is a great list Pete, and thanks for putting it out there. A few thoughts: I think it might be valuable to have some more context.  Reading this, someone could get the impression that you feel you are succeeding in spite of being an idiot.  Granted, you did some things that don't look so smart in hindsight.  On the other hand I happened to visit your organization in Guatemala when you were in the midst of making a rule number 2 correction and dropping half your technologies.  You had reviewed the benefits and costs to your constituents and you realized that a lot of what you had been offering was not providing sufficient benefit.  Such disruptive course correction is painful and requires clarity of purpose, discipline and lots of hard work going forward to get the organization back in balance.  Social enterprise is not easy or clear and involves dealing with failure. So, I think even though it can be painful to get through the messiness and mistakes, success requires being open to learning from failure and finding a way to not keep making the same mistakes even when it involves unpleasant medicine.  If you can do that you are more of a genius than an idiot.
Oct 26, 2009
Taghi Amirani said...
I not only enjoyed reading this Peter (like your no nonsense language), but learnt a great deal, even though it's not an area of direct interest.

One thing a friend of mine, a TEDster in SF, says about non-profits is this: calling non-profits "non-profit" is too negative. Call them Public Benefit Corporations, she says. She runs several big ones in SF.

Oct 28, 2009
 said...
Taghi, agreed, NFP is a horrible designation, and an archaic structure. I really think the l3c & B-corp type movements hold the future promise for merging scalability with social benefit.

gdaf - Gwyn, I am definitely not trying to say I am at core an idiot. But I did dive head first into a few things that could have been better laid out. Thanks for the compliment at the end. Hopefully we can move an IDDS down to Guatemala one of these years (not next year though, give me some time to prep stuff)

Pragzz, We are actually developing some new social value metrics around our work that we hope will rephrase the discussion with our donors. Instead of just counting heads and projects it is specifically aimed at trying to monetize the value of the service received by our constituents and significantly exceeding our budget with that social value. Basically we are trying to calculate what our social "profit" would be. It brings the conversation back to what is being invested into the community. I think this type of transparency with donors helps both sides get away from nitpicking about whether a truck or a technician's salary is more important for the mission.

Colleen, I definitely don't have regrets in starting AIDG. I was just trying to get people to think about the opportunities to be entrepreneurial within an existing org. E.G. we are part of a network of SME enterprises that started this year called ANDE. Even though it is part of the Aspen Institute which has been around for decades the ANDE staff are like a startup within the larger organization. These types of opportunities exist but many people don't realize it and don't look for them.

Nov 19, 2009
soccapital said...
Great post. Lots of helpful insights here.

Here are a couple of complementary articles you might enjoy - http://bit.ly/32TfFa and http://bit.ly/4cRT9D

Leave a comment...

 
To leave a comment on this posterous, please login by clicking one of the following.
Posterous-login     Connect     twitter